|
|
|
|
Robotics Technology Replacing Automotive in Michigan?
Posted by
robopatrj
on
Monday, April 03, 2006 (EST)
Can the robotics industry replace the automotive industry in Michigan? The Chair of Robotics and Automation gives his reasons why he thinks it can.
|
|
I think it is fair to say that all of us know that the automotive industry is changing and those changes will adversely affect Michigan’s economy. If GM, Ford and Chrysler decide to close, or they decide to drastically change the way they do business (i.e. they slim down to approximately 1/5th of their current business), Michigan will definitely feel an impact since about 5.1% (265,000 people) of its labor force are directly involved with automotive manufacturer (not a supplier) in 2005. Given that this may happen in the near future, it would be prudent for Michigan to find other technologies which can be used to employ its citizens and keep Michigan completive in the Global Market? If so, what technology should that be? I would like to suggest that Robotics is one technology that has the potential to impact the economy of Michigan on nearly the same scale as the automotive industry has. I will present a number of arguments to support this claim throughout the remainder of this article. The success of the automobile started with Henry Ford and the conception of the assembly line. This made the manufacture of autos cheap enough, enabling the middle class to afford one and, at the same time, getting everyone to want one as well, thus creating a huge market. At the same time, Ford was also offering high wages for those who would work in the plants building these cars. Now let’s apply these same things to robots. If robots were to be built in large numbers on assembly lines then their unit price would be driven downward as well. The novelty of having a robot do your dishes or walk your dog, I think, would be more then enough for people to want one especially since these are the types of chores people don’t want to do anyway. The skills it will take to design robots that can be built on assembly lines and allow that line to build multiple type of robots (much like auto plants build multiple styles of vehicle), will most definitely demand high wages. In order to fill such a high tech industry, education and skill levels of the Michigan worker will need to increase. Robotics are very complex and diverse in their technology requiring competent engineers and technicians to conceive and manufacture these machines. Pneumatics, Micro Processing, Mathematical Algorithms for the emulation of intelligence and many more areas of science and engineering all need to come together to create one working robot. However, is that much different from the automobile. Cars today have far more computing power then the first computers that brought the US to the forefront of space exploration. Hydraulic brakes, Fuel efficiency Algorithms, Pollution reducing devices and other technologies are also incorporated in modern Automobiles. Furthermore, many of our economic leaders are telling us that the skill level of the average US employee will need to expand to allow the US to compete in a global economy. Shifting Michigan’s attention from automotive to robotic seems to me would be a solution that solves many of the problems faced by most states in the union. Some might be thinking “Yes but what about the assembly jobs the automotive industry offers. Where will they be in Michigan in a robotic future?” and that would be a fair question. The answer, I feel, is that robots need to be assembled just like cars and trucks do. Currently, most industrial robots have 3 main pieces and 6 joints. There is a base and two sections which form the arm. These pieces have to be made separately and then jointed together by the joints of the robot. Gear boxes need to be assembled, wiring has be installed to the motors and external devices, nuts and bolts have to be placed and tightened on top of other peripheral operations that go into the assembly of one industrial robot. When industrial robots give way to residential robots and personal robots, their will be more assembly required proportional to the varying applications and complexity of these machines. Assembly positions within robotics companies may not be a plentiful as they are within the automotive industry, but they will certainly not disappear. As I am sure most of you have realized, this article has not been a comprehensive study of how Michigan may go from an automotive state to a robotic state in a certain amount of time. The article is based on my thoughts and ideas as a young robotics engineer with a mind eager to embrace its imagination and what may be possible. Although the thoughts and ideas presented here are by no means impossible, they not exactly likely to occur overnight. However, they can occur and if we, as the engineering community, open our minds to the possibility that it is possible to use robotics technology, not only to improve the economic position of Michigan, but also to improve the quality of our lives much like other technologies have, then maybe we have a future that is worth looking forward to.
Anyone interested in learning more about robotics and how they may be used to affect changes like those described in this article. Please feel free to contact Chapter 14 Robotics and Automation chair, Robert Sealy at 248-894-2364 or robert.sealy@ieee.org
|
|
|
|

robots.net
Recent robots.net articles
TGIMBOEJ for DIY Roboticists Launched!
The Great Internet Migratory Box of Electronic Junk (aka TGIMBOEJ) has
left the building! As promised in our earlier story on migratory
junk boxes, robots.net has launched one especially for robot
builders. There are now are a dozen or so TGIMBOEJ boxes moving around
the world but ours is the only one designed by and for roboticists. The
first recipients of the box will be Kris and Carly, those
robot-savvy
girls from Iowa who developed an award-winning
iRobot Create robot
painter for the 2007 Austin Maker Faire. They'll get first choice of all
the interesting junk and will adding in some of their own. Who will get
the box next? Maybe you. To be considered as a recipient, you need to
add your name as well as a link to your blog to the TGIMBOEJ wiki box request
page. Please also add a note by your name saying you're requesting
the robots.net box to make it easy for us to find you. We'll be posting
updates as the box reaches new recipients and you can also following
it's progress at the TGIMBOEJ
wiki tracking page. Our box is designated robots.net-box1. (pretty
catchy name, eh?) So, you're probably wonder what useless junk, er, I
mean valuable electronic and robotic components, made the final cut and
got included in the box? Read on for a partial list and more photos.
Biologists Discover Cellular Bang-Bang Controller
A robots.net reader sent us a link to a Princenton
news release describing research by Raj Chakrabarti and others on
cellular proteins that act as
adaptive machines, guiding biological evolution. Our reader notes,
proteins configured as bang-bang controllers steer random mutations
in deterministic directions; robot navigation algorithms as a mechanism
for self-directed evolution. A bang-bang
controller is a simple algorithm that bounces between two extremes
like a household thermostat. This type of control is commonly used in
robotics and, it now appears, is an integrel part of every living cell.
The cellular bang-bang controller guides random mutations in a way that
corrects imbalances, even repairing mutations that disable the
controlling protein chains. This is also fascinating to anyone who
appreciates cybernetics. It's a great example of a cybernetic feedback
loop, much like a centrifugal regulator on a steam engine. This disovery
is likely to make some waves in the field of evolutionary biology as it
suggests a cellular mechanism guiding the way the cell responds to
natural selection. Will it make waves in robotics as well? I doubt it
will make anyone throw out proportional control, but I wonder if we'll
see bang-bang being favored in biomorphic robot designs? You can read
more about this research on Raj
Chakrabarti's home page where you can also find a copy of the full
paper, "Mutagenic
evidence for the optimal control of evolutionary dynamics" (PDF format).
ROOFUS Tackles Snow
Designer Michal Glogowski submits a 220 pound
robotic solution (Yanko Design Link)
to the problem of snow build-up on flat-roofed commercial buildings.
ROOFUS is conceptualized for either remote controlled or autonomous
operation,
and provides blades for collecting snow or breaking up ice.
The frozen payload is stored in a container, then ejected dump-truck
style over the side of the building or into a chute.
In addition to saving untold man-hours of shoveling and tingling
fingers, ROOFUS can be outfitted with grass-mowing blades, street
sweeping attachments, or floor polishing pads.
While it looks like some technical details still need to be worked out,
and a trip to the the safety review department is in order,
ROOFUS could be a common site among Google map viewers
in the not-so-distant future.
Are Robots the Solution to the Economic Crisis?
Traditional wisdom, as championed by Marshall Brain, holds that a
robotics revolution will displace human workers leading to massive global
unemployment. Mobile Robots, Inc. suggests another possibility.
Perhaps focusing on robots could create an employment boom, pulling us
out of the current global economic crisis. In a recent press release
they say, "During the recessionary Eighties, thousands moved into
high-paying new jobs in personal computers, building an industry that
powered two decades of US economic growth. MobileRobots hopes the
autonomous robot industry will behave similarly." To this end,
they've announced a new RoboDeveloper discount
program to get more robots into the hands of more individuals and
companies. They believe this will "lower the barrier of entry into the
robotics industry". Jeanne Dietsch,
CEO of Mobile Robots, notes, "The government’s too busy bailing out
banks and failing corporations to see that they would get far more jobs
for the buck building new industries." Will the upcoming change-over
to the more
tech and science saavy Obama administration make an approach like this
more feasible? Or is Marshall Brain right that robots lead to
unemployment for humans? Read on for the full text of the Mobile Robots
press release.
Random Robot Roundup
I'm back and starting the week with a dump of the editors mailbox. First
up is an unusual Craigslist
personals posting in search of "creative robot chicks"; but
be careful
girls, as you face a battle to the death if you're not of up this
robot's standards (oh, and enjoy the ad while you can; CL ads tends to
vanish pretty quickly). After battling robots in the street, you may
need medical attention. A Reuters
story has just the thing, all the latest in robotic medical
technology. As you recover from your robotic surgery, you can listen to
Waseda
University's latest musical robot play the flute. The Swirling
Brain sent some interesting things our way too, like a story about robotic
sculptures that watch you watching them; and how about a new
office chair that's a really a robot leg with a seat bolted onto
it?; if sitting on a robot doesn't sound like fun, maybe you'd prefer Honda's
new mini-exoskeleton that augments just your legs. We also heard
about a public radio Marketplace
interview with Richard Dooling, author of Rapture for the Geeks.
Engineering News posted a short
article on RoboCup robot soccer. Our friends at Instructables posted
a new DIY
telepresence robot. Over at io9, there's a story on the remake
of Forbidden Planet - and that means we may be seeing Robby the
Robot on the big screen again. Rog-a-matic noticed a
cool NASA photo of the ISS
robot at work. We've also got several from Roland Piquepaille, one
on flying robots
inspired by nature, another on low flying robot
helicopters, and a new story on that 700 ton Caterpillar robot
mining truck that we reported on a while back. Know any other robot
news, gossip, or amazing facts we should report? Send 'em our way please.
Last Refreshed 11/20/2008 10:29:30 PM
|
|